7月14日雅思阅读答案解析

2022-07-07 02:00:16   第一文档网     [ 字体: ] [ 阅读: ] [ 文档下载 ]
说明:文章内容仅供预览,部分内容可能不全。下载后的文档,内容与下面显示的完全一致。下载之前请确认下面内容是否您想要的,是否完整无缺。下载word有问题请添加QQ:admin处理,感谢您的支持与谅解。点击这里给我发消息

#第一文档网# 导语】以下是®第一文档网的小编为您整理的《7月14日雅思阅读答案解析》,欢迎阅读!
雅思阅读,解析,答案

714日雅思阅读答案解析

考试概述:

本次考试包括填空题、选择题、主旨题、判断题,对于学生的细节把握和概括能力比较有要求,整体阅读新题比例很大,主要考察学生的基本功和有效搜索信息的能力。不论新题旧题,都无需慌张,因为对大多数考生来说,机经没看完,考试中遇到的就都是新题,心态放平,沉着应对。 二、具体题目分析 Passage 1

题型:选择1+填空4+填空4+选择4

文章大意:新题,大意为深海里的新发现以及其带来的影响。 参考文章(待回忆) 参考答案(待回忆) Passage2

题型:主旨7+填空5+选择1

文章大意:新题,大意为看到广告,孩子与成人的不同,可能没有足够的语言来表达自己的想法,并通过实验证明正反观点,列举其他人使用理论整理实验的缺陷等,最后提到了广告对社会的其他影响。

参考文章(待回忆) 参考答案(待回忆) Passage3


题型:判断6+填空7+选择1

文章大意:科技类文章,伦敦英国科学研究所的辩论会汇集了全世界科学家对于风险的讨论,科学家们的正反观点以及原因,列举其中的关键性问题,统计数据并不是人们在衡量风险时的考虑因素。 参考文章 Assessingthe Risk

How do wejudge whether it is right to go ahead with a new technology? Applying

Theprecautionary principle property and you wont go far wrong, says Colin Tudge. Section 1 A

As atitle for a supposedly unprejudiced debate on scientific progress, “Panicattack: interrogating our obsession with risk” did not bode well. Heldlast week at the Royal Institution in London, the event brought togetherscientists from across the world to ask why society is so obsessed with riskand to call for a “more rational” approach. “We seem to beorganising society around the grandmotherly maxim of ‘‘better safe than sorry’’” exclaimed Spiked, the online publication that organised the event.”What are the consequences of this overbearing concern with risks?” B


Thedebate was preceded by a survey of 40 scientists who were invited to describehow awful our lives would be if the “precautionary principle” hadbeen allowed to prevail in the past. Their response was: no heart surgery orantibiotics, and hardly any drugs at all; no aeroplanes, bicycles orhigh-voltage power grids; no pasteurisation, pesticides or biotechnology; noquantum of America. C

Theyhave absolutely missed the point. The precautionary principle is a subtle idea.It has various forms, but all of them generally include some notion ofcost-effectiveness. Thus the point is not simply to ban things that are notknown to be absolutely safe. Rather, it says: “Of course you can make noprogress without risk. But if there is no obvious gain from taking the risk,then dont take it.”


本文来源:https://www.dywdw.cn/e8a5c06cef630b1c59eef8c75fbfc77da26997c1.html

相关推荐
推荐阅读