【#第一文档网# 导语】以下是®第一文档网的小编为您整理的《政治学专业文献》，欢迎阅读！
政治学专业文献 论文 1. T. Nagel, “Hobbes” Concept of Obligation”, Philosophical Review, Vol. 68, No. 1, Jan., 1959. 2. J. Dunn, “Consent in the Political Theory of John Locke”, Historical Journal Vol. 10, No. 2. 1967. 3. J. Cohen, “Structure, Choice and Legitimacy: Locke”s Theory of the State”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 15, No. 4. Autumn 1986. 4. S. Benhabib, “The Methodological Illusions of Modern Political Theory: the Case of Rawls and Habermas”, Neue Hefte fur Philosophie, Vol. 21, 1982. 5. T. McCarthy, “Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue”, Ethics, Vol. 105, No. 1. Oct., 1994. 6. C. Larmore, “The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism”, The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 96, No. 12. Dec., 1999. 7. A. Sen, “Rights and Agency”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 11, No. 1. Winter, 1982. 8. O. O”Neill, “Constructivism vs. Contractualism”, Ratio, XVI 4 December 2003. 9. S.M. Okin, “Justice and Gender”, Philosophy and Public Affairs Vol. 16, No. 1. Winter, 1987. 10. Iris Marion Young, “Polity and Group Difference: A Critique of the Idea of Universal Citizenship”, Ethics, Vol. 99, No. 2. Jan., 1989. 11. M. Walzer, “The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism”, Political Theory, Vol. 18, No. 1. Feb., 1990. 12. M. Walzer, “Philosophy and Democracy”, Political Theory, Vol. 9, No. 3. Aug., 1981. 13. A. Buchanan, “Assessing the Communitarian Critique of Liberalism”, Ethics, Vol. 99, No. 4. Jul., 1989. 14. J. Waldron, “Theoretical Foundations of Liberalism”, Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 147. Apr., 1987. 15. N. Fraser, “From Redistribution to Recognition? Dilemmas of Justice in a „Post-Socialist‟ Age”, New Left Review, 212, 1995. Arendt Lijphart, “Comparative politics and the comparative method” American Political Review, Vol. 65, No. 3. Sep., 1971. J. G. March & J. P. Olsen, “The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life” American Political Science Review, Vol. 78, No. 3. Sep., 1984. 18. Peter Hall & Rosemary Taylor, “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms”, Political Studies, Vol. 44. No. 5. 19. E. Ostrom, “Rational Choice Theory and Institutional Analysis: Towards Complementarity”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 85, No. 1. Mar., 1991. 20. Karl Deutsch, “Social mobilization and political development”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 55, No. 3. Sep., 1961. 21. Phillippe C Schmitter, “Still the Century of Corporatism?”, in Frederick B. Pike & Thomas Stritch eds., Social-Political Structure in the Iberian World, University of Notre Dame Press, 1974, pp.85-130. 22. Jack A. Goldstone, “Theories of revolution: the third generation”, World Politics, Vol. 32, No. 3. Apr., 1980. 23. A. Stepan & C. Skach, “Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: parliamentarianism versus presidentialism”, World Politics, Vol. 46, No. 1. Oct., 1993. 25. Mancur Olson, “Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development”, The American Political Science Review Vol. 87, No. 3. Sep., 1993. 26. Samuel Huntington, “Political development and political decay”, World Politics, Vol. 17, No. 3. Apr., 1965. 27. Ronald Inglehart, “The renaissance of political culture”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 82, No. 4. Dec., 1988. 28. Robert Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York : Simon & Schuster,2001. （没找到代表性文章，只好列出书名在这） 29. E. Muller, & M. Sellgson, “Civic culture and democracy”, American Political Science Review, Vol. 88, No. 3. Sep., 1994. 30. Theda Skocpol, “State and revolution: old regimes and revolutionary crises in France, Russia, and China”, Theory and Society, Vol. 7, No. 1/2, Special Double Issue on State and Revolution, Jan. - Mar., 1979. 31. Theda Skocpol, “Bringing the state back in: strategies of analysis in current research” in P. B. Evans, et al. Bringing the state back in, New York: Cambrige University Press, 1985. 32. Doris Graber, “Political communication: scope, progress, promise”, in A. Finifter ed., Political Science: The State of the Discipline, Ⅱ, Washington, D. C.: American Political Science Association,1983, pp305-334. 33. G. Sartori, “From the sociology of politics to political sociology”. in S. M. Lipset ed., Politics and the Social Science, New York: Oxford University Press, 1969, pp. 65-100. 34. 埃尔斯特，(1986) ，“市场与论坛：三种政治理论”，谈火生编《审议民主》，江苏人民出版社2007年 35. 哈贝马斯：“民主的三种规范模式”，载于《文化研究》第二辑，天津社会科学出版社2001年 36. 约翰·罗尔斯，“再论公共理性”，载于《公共理性与现代学术》，三联书店2000年 著作 一、节选 1．大卫．马什，格里．斯托克，《政治科学的理论与方法》（第13章“结构与能动”，第14章“制度与观念”），中国人民大学出版社2006年 2．熊彼得，《资本主义、社会主义与民主》（第四编），商务印书馆1999年 3．Dankward A Rustow, “Transition to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model”, in Lisa Anderson ed., Transitions to Democracy, Columbia University Press, 2004. 4．Nancy Bermeo, “Myths of Moderation: Confrontation and Conflict During Democratic Transitions”,in Lisa Anderson ed., Transitions to Democracy, Columbia University Press, 2004 5．Alfred Stephen, “Reflections on „Problem Selection‟”, in idem., Arguing Comparative Politics, New York, NY: Oxford University Press 2001. 6．Frank Cunningham, “Liberal Democracy and Its Problems”, in idem., Theories of Democracy, London and NewYork: Routledge, 2002. 7．Juan J. Linz, and Alfred Stepan, “Theoretical Overview”, in idems, Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation, The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1996. 本文来源：https://www.dywdw.cn/ef2824a955270722192ef7e9.html
下载此文档
搜索文档
阅读：
文档下载
2022-12-16
